A federal judge who previously blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship spent more than an hour ...

The United States’ birthright citizenship may be unique, writes Armstrong Williams, but that doesn’t mean it should be ...

The birthright citizenship legal challenge at the Supreme Court is not a minor adjustment to immigration policy, but a fundamental redefinition of citizenship itself.

But on Monday, President Donald Trump challenged the 14th Amendment's longstanding guarantee of birthright citizenship by issuing an executive order to end the granting of citizenship to children ...

He wants to exclude from “birthright citizenship” babies born in the U.S. to parents here illegally or temporarily, including on student or tourist visas.

William Galston makes several errors in his column “In Defense of Birthright Citizenship,” Politics & Ideas, Feb. 12). The evolution in the law of naturalization shows that the difference ...

Birthright citizenship is not a loophole. It is a cornerstone of our constitutional framework, enshrined in the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to “All persons born or naturalized ...

The central dispute yesterday morning was not about the birthright-citizenship order itself. Instead, it was about the relief that plaintiffs ought to get assuming that the order is unconstitutional.

President Donald Trump is seeking to end birthright citizenship, a constitutional right enshrined in the 14th Amendment. We asked two experts in constitutional and immigration law to walk us ...

On Day 1 of his second term, President Trump signed an executive order attempting to rewrite the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and end birthright citizenship as we know it.

In other words, it did not answer whether those not subject to the political jurisdiction were entitled to birthright citizenship. The court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark, concluding that the ...