The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary ...

Sonia Mittal–a senior January 6 prosecutor–details the firings, demotions, and investigations of DOJ prosecutors. Mittal argues these executive ac ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray ...

Can courts review the President’s retaliatory decision to revoke security clearances? In this Essay, Stanford J.D. Candidate Shreeya Singh argues Su ...

Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace the enduring debate of the President’s removal power. Together they provide a comprehensive yet succinct history ...

Craig Konnoth’s Article, using “medical civil rights” as an angle onto disability, captures the ostensible benefits of disability legal claiming ...

Abstract. The United States Supreme Court’s decisions last Term, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee and Americans forProsperity v. Bonta, mark only the beginning of a conservative ...

Moreover, the concern about the lack of individualized decisionmaking is particularly significant when the use of bail schedules is not limited to pre-appearance release decisionmaking and there is a ...

If Section 21 had targeted not only deposits, but also any instruments designed to serve the same economic function as deposits, its enforcement would have gone a long way to eliminating the key ...

Within the context of government grants to private entities conditioned on restrictions of speech, scholars and courts have been grasping for something like an extension of Dole’s independent ...