Judge Jay Bybee said it's “important to have a set of rules” for overturning precedent, citing the high court's 2022 decision ...

The 88-page judgement emphasises that the word "biological" does not appear in the definition of man or woman in the Equality ...

Plyler embodies a constitutional insight as urgent today as it was in 1982: that equality is not achieved through formal ...

The Trump administration is advancing a proposal that would significantly alter the interpretation of the Endangered Species ...

Birds are among the most vulnerable. Since humans arrived, 71 birds have gone extinct, according to the state Department of ...

This week, we’re examining the potential shake-up in presidential power over independent federal agencies and what a review ...

The UK Supreme Court, operated by the five most senior judges in the country, has officially defined what a woman is. Lord ...

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that the Equality Act’s definition of a woman is based on biological sex. Five judges ...

Rapidly evolving AI tools that can flow from a developer to an adapter to an end user are stirring a growing legal conundrum ...

"Constitutional protections would be worth little indeed if they wilt in the face of presidential incursion." The post ‘Clear ...

It didn’t create a binding legal precedent, but I think that future handbooks and university programs will definitely cite this case to teach the new generation of digital lawyers. Magazine ...

This, Karp argued, violated the standard set by Massachusetts law and the Supreme Judicial Court’s precedent in Pheasant Ridge Assocs. (1987), which allows courts to scrutinize takings for ...