ITAT Vishakhapatnam held that invocation of deemed rent under section 23 (1) (a) of the Income Tax Act unjustified since property of the assessee is leased out for a continuous long period for the ...

ITAT Visakhapatnam held that CIT (A) didn’t admit the additional evidence produced by the assessee by simply holding that no request for admission of additional evidence under rule 46A was filed.

यह कि जीएसटी अधिनियम 2017 के अंतर्गत वित्तीय वर्ष 2017-18 से 2019-20 के लिए एक एमनेस्टी स्कीम लाई की गई है जिससे दिनांक 1 नवंबर 2024से प्रभावी किया गया है , इस लेख के माध्यम से यह बताया गया है कि इस ...

ITAT Vishakhapatnam allowed weighted deduction under section 35 (2AB) of the Income Tax Act since amount received from Department of Scientific & Industrial Research [DSIR] is soft loan and hence ...

CESTAT Allahabad held that material imported based MOEF permission by a company cannot be diverted to any other unit for any ...

CESTAT Chennai held that no customs duty could be demanded on the material intended for use in the factory, however, were destroyed by fire accident. Accordingly, duty demand not sustained.

In the said notification, in the Table, against serial number 9, relating to the State of Maharashtra, in column (3) the item (iv), and the corresponding entry thereto in column (4) shall be omitted. ...

Women Booking Hotel Room With A Men Does Not Imply Her Consent For Sex: Bombay HC ...

Union of India, the Calcutta High Court ruled that GST proceedings are not invalidated simply because a Show Cause Notice ...